If a compliance software is priced at $12,000 per year. Are you paying too much?
The answer is contingent on what it is replacing.
If automation eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious evidence collection across a complicated technology environment, $12,000 could be well-spent. If a seven-person startup could have the same proof manually in a few minutes every month, the total will be very different.
It is a great method to look for Vanta alternatives. The question of which platform offers the most advanced features isn’t the only thing to consider. Find out how your company’s features will help you save time and money.
The Break-Even Point for Automation
It’s not inherently good or bad. The benefits of compliance automation is dependent on the size of the business. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company with multiple cloud environments and various applications. The burden of manually collecting evidence constantly could be extremely high. Integrations that can automatically monitor systems and gather evidence can easily justify their expense.
Think about a company with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2. It could have a small infrastructure, and the documentation of the evidence could be handled with minimal automation.
This is a crucial distinction when looking at Vanta’s pricing. A high-end platform can offer substantial capabilities, but those capabilities deliver financial value only when an organization actually requires these capabilities.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
Searching for Vanta or Drata quickly becomes a feature-by -feature task. Both platforms are based on automation and integration companies that are looking to adopt this approach can benefit from comparing the frameworks supported, their integrations and service as well as individual quotations and contracts.
There’s a second decision to take prior to that. Do you think your business is ready for an integration-driven compliance system in any way? Some companies prefer continuous monitoring as well as automated evidence collection and automated evidence collection. Some companies prefer to create their own evidence, especially in cases of low workload.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Use the Same Model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. There are platforms with less cluttered designs which focus more on the organization of systems rather and connectivity.
CertAssist is part of this group. CertAssist, created by compliance consultants, internal auditors and other professionals, organizes control frameworks in a central place. It offers editable policies and guidelines for evidence and allows auditors to view evidence through read-only access.
It does not, in fact, connect to operational systems, or install infrastructure agents. Customers can upload their own documentation.
System Access is a consideration in the Decision
It is obvious that removing integrations is a disadvantage. Someone must collect evidence manually.
This eliminates the need to integrate, and the process of compliance does not require any connection to the operational environment.
The structures of one are not superior to each other. It is essential to inquire what tradeoffs are appropriate for your company.
CertAssist is aimed at teams comprising between five and 200 persons. The company publishes its prices, rather than requiring an initial sales call to determine the starting figure. The stated launch price for CertAssist is $225 monthly rather than an average of $375.
Let Complexity Get Its Due
The needs of a 10-person start-up today might not necessarily match its requirements at 100 or 500 employees.
While compliance is simple an easy platform can be a good idea. As the number of employees, systems frameworks, and evidence requirements increase, the economy could ultimately favor more automation. It’s better to let complexity of compliance technology earn its rightful place.
Do not pay for fifty different integrations because they appear impressive on the comparison chart. They should be paid for only when you realize that the cost of the work manually is higher.